7 Best Veeam Competitors and Alternatives for MSPs

If you’re comparing Veeam competitors, you’re probably evaluating backup solutions that better fit your MSP’s workflows and pricing model. While Veeam remains strong for VM and datacenter protection, many MSPs look for alternatives that offer:

• Cloud-native architecture for Microsoft 365 and SaaS data.
  
• Multi-tenant management to serve multiple clients at scale.
  
• Predictable pricing without hidden storage or licensing costs.
  
• Streamlined integration with PSA, RMM, and billing systems.
  

In this guide, we break down the 7 leading alternatives to Veeam — Syncro Cloud Backup, Datto, Acronis, Druva, N-able Backup, MSP360, and Commvault.

Key takeaways

• Veeam isn’t always the best fit for every MSP— consider licensing, multi-tenant UX, and cloud-native requirements.
• Centralize alerts, ticketing, and remediation in Syncro to reduce operational overhead and speed up resolution.
• Datto, Acronis, Druva, N‑able Backup, MSP360, and Commvault each align with distinct MSP profiles.
• Use the downloadable POC checklist and ROI template to validate RTO/RPO, integrations, and total cost of ownership.

What is Veeam? Why MSPs search for alternatives

Veeam is one of the most established backup and recovery platforms, best known for virtual machine (VM) protection, image-based backups, and replication for datacenter workloads. Many MSPs continue to use Veeam to secure on-prem servers and hybrid environments where virtualization is a priority.

But as client needs evolve, MSPs often explore Veeam competitors for several reasons:

• Licensing complexity: Veeam’s pricing model can be difficult to predict, especially when scaling across multiple tenants.
  
• Limited SaaS coverage: Veeam’s strengths lie in VMs and servers, but it offers less depth for Microsoft 365, OneDrive, Teams, and Entra ID.
  
• Multi-tenant challenges: Managing multiple client environments in Veeam can require extra overhead and third-party integrations.
  
• Variable total cost of ownership (TCO): Storage costs, add-ons, and parallel licenses during migration can make Veeam more expensive than expected.

That’s why many MSPs evaluate Veeam alternatives like Syncro Cloud Backup, Datto, Acronis, Druva, MSP360, Commvault, and N-able Backup. These competitors often deliver cloud-native architecture, simpler billing, SaaS-first coverage, and MSP-friendly multi-tenant management.

Veeam competitors: Evaluation criteria for MSPs

When you’re weighing Veeam alternatives, keep your focus on the factors that matter most for MSP operations:

• Recovery reliability (RTO/RPO): Validate that restores are fast, consistent, and tested across workloads.
  
• Cloud-native support: Look for deep coverage of Microsoft 365, OneDrive, Teams, and Entra ID, not just servers and VMs.
  
• Multi-tenant administration: A clean interface should let you manage all clients without extra overhead.
  
• Automation and monitoring: Strong APIs and webhooks let you tie backup events into ticketing, reporting, and remediation.
  
• Compliance and reporting: Tenant-level reports and audit exports keep you aligned with regulatory needs.
  
• Pricing transparency: Flat per-user or per-endpoint pricing is easier to forecast than storage-based fees.
  
• Deployment and support: Smooth onboarding and MSP-aware support teams make rollout less painful.

Weight these factors by your MSP profile:

• Small MSPs: Choose predictable pricing and easy onboarding.
• Growth-focused MSPs: Prioritize automation, APIs, and multi-tenant UX.
• Enterprise-heavy MSPs: Look for advanced compliance, policy control, and broad platform coverage.

Red flags include opaque pricing, weak API/webhook support, missing tenant-level reporting, and unclear restore performance data.

Quick comparison: Best Veeam competitors at a glance

If you’re shortlisting Veeam competitors, it helps to see how alternatives stack up side by side. Many MSPs want to know: 

• Which vendor is best for SaaS coverage? 
• Which has predictable pricing? 
• Which integrates directly with RMM and PSA tools? 

This snapshot highlights the essentials so you can make faster, more confident decisions.

What to compare when evaluating Veeam alternatives

• Backup coverage: Identify whether the vendor protects VMs, endpoints, Microsoft 365, Entra ID, or SaaS workloads.
  
• Cloud-native depth: Cloud-first platforms scale faster and reduce reliance on appliances.
  
• Multi-tenant management: Look for role-based access, centralized dashboards, and per-client reporting.
  
• Integration readiness: Robust APIs and webhooks simplify automation for monitoring, ticketing, and billing.
  
• Pricing model: Flat per-user fees are easier to predict than storage-based or modular licensing.
  
• Best-fit profile: Match each solution to the type of MSP (small, growth-focused, enterprise-heavy).

Vendor comparisons: 7 Veeam alternatives

Each vendor summary below includes a quick overview, pros and cons, the ideal MSP use case, and a direct comparison to Veeam.

Syncro Cloud Backup: Best for Microsoft 365 and Entra ID with built-in billing

Overview

Syncro Cloud Backup is built directly into the Syncro XMM™ platform, giving MSPs a seamless way to protect Microsoft 365 and Entra ID data while consolidating operations inside one tool. 

Unlike Veeam, which is primarily designed for VM and datacenter workloads, Syncro focuses on the SaaS-first needs of modern MSPs. It provides automated backups for Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Entra ID identity objects, all paired with unlimited storage under a flat per-user fee.

For MSPs who struggle with juggling separate backup tools, billing systems, and monitoring consoles, Syncro Cloud Backup offers a unified workflow. By integrating protection, rapid restore, and automated invoicing directly into Syncro’s PSA and RMM environment, it removes the friction of managing multiple vendors.

Pros

• Flat-rate pricing: Simple per-user monthly fee with unlimited storage under a fair-use policy.
• Broad Microsoft 365 coverage: Protects Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Entra ID identities.
• Fast restore options: Granular recovery for files, emails, and user mailboxes with minimal downtime.
• Automated billing integration: Backup charges flow directly into invoices, ensuring predictable revenue.
• Multi-tenant readiness: Designed for MSPs managing multiple Microsoft 365 tenants in one console.
• Ease of use: Built directly into Syncro’s platform, reducing tool sprawl and onboarding time.
  

Cons

• Limited workload scope: Currently focused on Microsoft 365 and Entra ID, not broader server or VM environments.
  Newer entrant: Lacks some of the long legacy presence and brand recognition of larger competitors.

G2 score

4.6

Why choose Syncro Cloud Backup

MSPs looking for a modern, SaaS-first Veeam alternative should consider Syncro Cloud Backup because it combines protection, billing, and management into a single pane of glass. 

Compared to Veeam, which may require complex licensing and multiple integrations for MSP workflows, Syncro delivers predictable pricing, faster onboarding, and streamlined day-to-day management. 

For service providers focused on Microsoft 365 and Entra ID clients, Syncro Cloud Backup provides both the technical coverage and the business model alignment to scale services profitably.

Datto: Best for hybrid BCDR with appliances

Overview

Datto is one of the most recognized Veeam competitors in the MSP market, particularly for its backup and disaster recovery (BDR) appliances paired with a managed cloud service. While Veeam focuses heavily on VM and image-based backup for datacenter workloads, Datto positions itself as an MSP-first provider with built-in continuity features, ransomware protection, and streamlined multi-tenant management. For MSPs delivering hybrid backup services (appliance + cloud) to SMBs, Datto often becomes a top Veeam alternative.

Pros

• MSP-focused design: Multi-tenant management tools are purpose-built for service providers.
• Hybrid continuity: Combines physical appliances with secure cloud replication for fast disaster recovery.
  Integrated ransomware detection: Adds another layer of security during backups.
• Strong support ecosystem: Datto’s MSP partnerships include 24/7 support and enablement resources.
  

Cons

• Appliance dependency: Some features require on-site hardware, which adds cost and logistics compared to cloud-native competitors.
• Higher pricing for cloud-only deployments: Datto’s cost structure is less attractive if you’re not using its appliances.
• Less SaaS depth: While Datto protects Microsoft 365, it lacks the breadth of SaaS integrations offered by cloud-native providers like Druva.

G2 Score

4.4 out of 5

Druva: Best for cloud-native SaaS backup

Overview

Druva is a cloud-native competitor to Veeam, purpose-built for MSPs managing SaaS-heavy environments. While Veeam is traditionally focused on virtual machines and on-premises workloads, Druva delivers elastic, cloud-first backup for endpoints, servers, and SaaS platforms such as Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and Google Workspace. MSPs that prioritize scalability and simplified management without hardware dependencies often view Druva as a leading alternative.

Pros

• Cloud-native design: Automatic scalability without infrastructure overhead.
  Broad SaaS coverage: Supports Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and Google Workspace.
• Compliance maturity: Advanced reporting and regulatory alignment for industries with strict requirements.
• Appliance-free model: Eliminates the need for hardware, reducing complexity.
  

Cons

• Pricing sensitivity: Costs can escalate with large datasets and long-term retention.
• Limited on-premises options: Not as strong for MSPs needing appliance-based or hybrid models.
• Learning curve: May require training for teams used to traditional backup approaches.
  

G2 score

4.6

N-able Backup: Best for unified MSP stack

Overview

N-able Backup is designed specifically for managed service providers who want a tightly integrated solution within the N-able ecosystem. Unlike Veeam, which is oriented toward enterprise and datacenter workloads, N-able focuses on simplifying operations for MSPs by pairing backup with its RMM and PSA tools. This makes it an appealing choice for service providers who prefer a single-vendor approach to IT management and data protection.

Pros

• Native ecosystem integration: Aligns directly with N-able RMM and PSA platforms.
  MSP-first design: Multi-tenant management features streamline client administration.
• Automated billing support: Usage data feeds into invoicing workflows to capture revenue.
  Simple deployment: Cloud-based backups are fast to configure and manage.
  

Cons

• Feature limitations: May lack some advanced enterprise or hybrid-cloud capabilities.
• Vendor lock-in risk: Works best when paired with other N-able products, limiting flexibility.
• Less depth for SaaS: Coverage is solid but not as extensive as cloud-native competitors like Druva.
  

G2 score

4.3

Commvault: Best for enterprise data management

Overview

Commvault is an enterprise-grade backup and data management platform that competes with Veeam at the high end of the market. It offers broad workload protection, policy-driven automation, and advanced compliance capabilities. For MSPs that serve large enterprises or clients with strict regulatory requirements, Commvault provides powerful controls and deep reporting, though it comes with more complexity than lighter MSP-focused solutions.

Pros

• Comprehensive coverage: Supports a wide range of workloads, including VMs, servers, databases, and SaaS.
• Policy-driven automation: Streamlines large-scale operations through advanced rules and workflows.
• Compliance strength: Built-in reporting and auditing features meet strict regulatory requirements.
• Scalable architecture: Designed to handle large enterprise environments efficiently.
  

Cons

• High complexity: Requires significant expertise to configure and maintain.
• Expensive model: Enterprise-level pricing makes it less suitable for small or cost-sensitive MSPs.
• Slower onboarding: More difficult to deploy compared with MSP-first competitors.
  

G2 score

4.1

Finding the right Veeam alternative for lasting value

Choosing the best Veeam competitor is less about finding a brand name and more about aligning the platform to your MSP’s goals. 

Reliability, pricing transparency, SaaS coverage, and multi-tenant management should all be considered when making your decision. A solution that helps you reduce tool sprawl, automate billing, and meet compliance requirements will create far more value than one that only checks the backup box.

For many MSPs, that means looking beyond legacy VM-first tools and prioritizing SaaS protection, simple pricing, and integrations that save time. That’s where Syncro Cloud Backup stands out. By combining Microsoft 365 and Entra ID protection with automated billing and built-in RMM/PSA workflows, it delivers both technical coverage and operational efficiency in one platform.

Ready to streamline your operations, improve recovery confidence, and capture more predictable revenue? Request a demo or start your free trial and start protecting your clients today.

---

By

Jillian Ho-Lung

I love crafting engaging, compelling narratives that highlight the transformative power of our solutions, and that guide MSP and IT leaders to greater heights of growth and success.

---

Share

• Share on Facebook
• Share on X
• Email this Page